Here are TLE code and AC code of the problem 504D-Misha and XOR, the difference between them is only the condition of the for loop, but i<maxn && m>=0
is a stronger condition. Does anyone have idea about what happened? Thanks a lot.
# | User | Rating |
---|---|---|
1 | tourist | 3757 |
2 | jiangly | 3647 |
3 | Benq | 3581 |
4 | orzdevinwang | 3570 |
5 | Geothermal | 3569 |
5 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
7 | Radewoosh | 3509 |
8 | ecnerwala | 3486 |
9 | jqdai0815 | 3474 |
10 | gyh20 | 3447 |
# | User | Contrib. |
---|---|---|
1 | maomao90 | 171 |
2 | awoo | 165 |
3 | adamant | 164 |
4 | TheScrasse | 159 |
5 | maroonrk | 155 |
6 | nor | 154 |
7 | -is-this-fft- | 152 |
8 | Petr | 147 |
9 | orz | 146 |
10 | pajenegod | 145 |
Here are TLE code and AC code of the problem 504D-Misha and XOR, the difference between them is only the condition of the for loop, but i<maxn && m>=0
is a stronger condition. Does anyone have idea about what happened? Thanks a lot.
Name |
---|
I've added
inline
and it's Accepted with the condition 11191452It's really interesting to know why this happened!
And then I changed
m>=0
tom>=-1
got Accepted... 11191443What's the difference between inline function and simple function? I used TLE code's loop condition and added inline — AC.
This is even more weird!
Here I added a variable x, and made it equal to m, it got TLE.
Here I made it equal to m+1 before the loop, and equal to m in the loop, it got AC!
Here I made it equal to m before the loop, and don't change it in the loop, it got AC!
Maybe it is a bug in the compiler optimizer? I hope someone figures that out!