| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 3757 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3647 |
| 3 | Benq | 3581 |
| 4 | orzdevinwang | 3570 |
| 5 | Geothermal | 3569 |
| 5 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
| 7 | Radewoosh | 3509 |
| 8 | ecnerwala | 3486 |
| 9 | jqdai0815 | 3474 |
| 10 | gyh20 | 3447 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | maomao90 | 171 |
| 2 | awoo | 165 |
| 3 | adamant | 163 |
| 4 | TheScrasse | 159 |
| 5 | maroonrk | 155 |
| 6 | nor | 154 |
| 7 | -is-this-fft- | 152 |
| 8 | Petr | 147 |
| 9 | orz | 146 |
| 10 | pajenegod | 145 |
Why is Python faster than C++ in this example?
So I am solving question 3 from here https://www.olympiad.org.uk/papers/2016/bio/bio16-exam.pdf
I have two pieces of code, one in Python and one in C++. C++ -> https://pastebin.com/bHkhZcZ6 Python -> https://pastebin.com/8G4BZQx6
Although the both pieces of code seem to be employing the same logic, the Python one seems to be a lot faster than C++.
An example test case could be -> 614700 3643 90149 -> (It should output 18)
Please can someone tell me why this is the case?
| Rev. | Lang. | By | When | Δ | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| en4 |
|
s3yoonpark | 2023-04-30 22:58:42 | 92 | (published) | |
| en3 |
|
s3yoonpark | 2023-04-30 22:53:51 | 0 | Added Images (saved to drafts) | |
| en2 |
|
s3yoonpark | 2023-04-30 22:49:17 | 1 | ||
| en1 |
|
s3yoonpark | 2023-04-30 22:48:49 | 503 | Initial revision (published) |
