Mo's Algorithm on Trees

Правка en9, от animeshf, 2016-02-20 14:00:42

Introduction

Mo's Algorithm has become pretty popular in the past few years and is now considered as a pretty standard technique in the world of Competitive Programming. This blog will describe a method to generalize Mo's algorithm to maintain information about paths between nodes in a tree.

Prerequisites

Mo's Algorithm — If you do not know this yet, read this amazing article before continuing with this blog.

Euler Tour or DFS Order of the Tree.

Problem 1 — Handling Subtree Queries

Consider the following problem. You will be given a rooted Tree T of N nodes where each node is associated with a value A[node]. You need to handle Q queries, each comprising one integer u. In each query you must report the number of distinct values in the subtree rooted at u. In other words, if you store all the values in the subtree rooted at u in a set, what would be the size of this set?

Constraints

1 ≤ N, Q ≤ 105

1 ≤ A[node] ≤ 109

Solution(s)

Seems pretty simple, doesn't it? One easy way to solve this is to flatten the tree into an array by doing a Preorder traversal and then implement Mo's Algorithm. Maintain a lookup table which maintains the frequency of each value in the current window. By maintaining this, the answer can be updated easily. The complexity of this algorithm would be

Note that you can also solve this in by maintaining a set in each node and merging the smaller set into the larger ones.

Problem 2 — Handling Path Queries

Now let's modify Problem 1 a little. Instead of computing the number of distinct values in a subtree, compute the number of distinct values in the unique path from u to v. I recommend you to pause here and try solving the problem for a while. The constraints of this problem are the same as Problem 1.

The Issue

An important reason why Problem (1) worked beautifully was because the dfs-order traversal made it possible to represent any subtree as a contiguous range in an array. Thus the problem was reduced to "finding number of distinct values in a subarray [L, R] of A[]. Note that it is not possible to do so for path queries, as nodes which are O(N) distance apart in the tree might be O(1) distance apart in the flattened tree (represented by Array A[].). So doing a normal dfs-order would not work out.

Observation(s)

Let a node u have k children. Let us number them as v1,v2...vk. Let S(u) denote the subtree rooted at u.

Let us assume that dfs() will visit u's children in the order v1,v2...vk. Let x be any node in S(vi) and y be any node in S(vj) and let i < j. Notice that dfs(y) will be called only after dfs(x) has been completed and S(x) has been explored. Thus, before we call dfs(y), we would have entered and exited S(x). We will exploit this seemingly obvious property of dfs() to modify our existing algorithm and try to represent each query as a contiguous range in a flattened array.

Modified DFS-Order

Let us modify the dfs order as follows. For each node u, maintain the Start and End time of S(u). Let's call them ST(u) and EN(u). The only change you need to make is that you must increment the global timekeeping variable even when you finish traversing some subtree (EN(u) = ++cur). In short, we will maintain 2 values for each node u. One will denote the time when you entered S(u) and the other would denote the time when you exited S(u). Thus, ST() and EN() will have no values in common. Consider the following tree. Given below are the ST() and EN() values of the nodes.

 ST(1) = 1 EN(1) = 18

ST(2) = 2 EN(2) = 11

ST(3) = 3 EN(3) = 6

ST(4) = 4 EN(4) = 5

ST(5) = 7 EN(5) = 10

ST(6) = 8 EN(6) = 9

ST(7) = 12 EN(7) = 17

ST(8) = 13 EN(8) = 14

ST(9) = 15 EN(9) = 16

The Algorithm

Now that we're equipped with the necessary weapons, let's understand how to process the queries. Let a query be (u, v). We will try to map each query to a range in the flattened array. Let L(u) ≤ L(v) where L(u) denotes level of node u in T. Let P = LCA(u, v) denote the lowest common ancestor of nodes u and v. There are 2 possible cases:

Case 1: P = u

In this case, our query range would be [ST(u), ST(v)]. Why will this work?

Consider any node x that does not lie in the (u, v) path.
Notice that x occurs twice or zero times in our specified query range.
Therefore, the nodes which occur exactly once in this range are precisely those that are on the (u, v) path! This forms the crux of our algorithm. Thus, while implementing Mo's, our add/remove function needs to check the number of times a particular node appears in a range. If it occurs twice (or zero times), then we don't take it's value into account! This can be easily implemented while moving the left and right pointers.

Case 2: P ≠ u

In this case, our query range would be [EN(u), ST(v)] + [ST(P), ST(P)].

The same logic as Case 1 applies here as well. The only difference is that we need to consider the value of P i.e the LCA separately, as it would not be counted in the query range.

This same problem is available on SPOJ.

If you aren't sure about some elements of this algorithm, take a look at this neat code.

Conclusion

We have effectively managed to reduce problem (2) to number of distinct values in a subarray by doing some careful bookkeeping. Now we can solve the problem in This modified DFS order works brilliantly to handle any type path queries and works well with Mo's algo. We can use a similar approach to solve many types of path query problems.

For example, consider the question of finding number of inversions in a (u, v) path in a Tree T, where each node has a value associated with it. This can now be solved in by using the above technique and maintaining a BIT or Segment Tree.

This is my first blog and I apologize for any mistakes that I may have made. Thanks a lot for reading!

Original Post

Related Blog

История

 
 
 
 
Правки
 
 
  Rev. Язык Кто Когда Δ Комментарий
en26 Английский animeshf 2016-09-23 01:52:39 61
en25 Английский animeshf 2016-05-15 22:32:37 0 (published)
en24 Английский animeshf 2016-05-15 22:32:02 364 Tiny change: '-on-trees)\n\n[Related' -> '-on-trees)<br>\n[Related' (saved to drafts)
en23 Английский animeshf 2016-05-11 18:55:07 9 Tiny change: '$ denotes level of node $' -> '$ denotes visit time of node $'
en22 Английский animeshf 2016-05-11 18:53:59 11 Tiny change: '$ denotes level of node $' -> '$ denotes visit time of node $'
en21 Английский animeshf 2016-02-20 16:54:39 9 Tiny change: 'elping me learn this tech' -> 'elping me understand this tech'
en20 Английский animeshf 2016-02-20 16:53:59 91
en19 Английский animeshf 2016-02-20 16:35:48 2 Tiny change: 'af27bf.png\n)\n$ST(1) =' -> 'af27bf.png)\n\n$ST(1) ='
en18 Английский animeshf 2016-02-20 14:33:55 0 Tiny change: ' reading! \n\n[Orig' -> ' reading! Please \n\n[Orig' (published)
en17 Английский animeshf 2016-02-20 14:30:22 92 Tiny change: 'erties.)\nThis for' -
en16 Английский animeshf 2016-02-20 14:24:05 5
en15 Английский animeshf 2016-02-20 14:18:29 8
en14 Английский animeshf 2016-02-20 14:17:18 60
en13 Английский animeshf 2016-02-20 14:12:24 11
en12 Английский animeshf 2016-02-20 14:09:45 18 Tiny change: 'blog. \n\nEuler Tour or DFS Or' -> 'blog. \n\nPreorder Traversal or DFS Or'
en11 Английский animeshf 2016-02-20 14:09:02 76
en10 Английский animeshf 2016-02-20 14:02:17 8 Tiny change: 'lgorithm. Thus, while imple' -> 'lgorithm. While imple'
en9 Английский animeshf 2016-02-20 14:00:42 30
en8 Английский animeshf 2016-02-20 13:59:37 10
en7 Английский animeshf 2016-02-20 13:58:45 138
en6 Английский animeshf 2016-02-20 13:54:18 4 Tiny change: 'eading! \n\n\n' -> 'eading! \n'
en5 Английский animeshf 2016-02-20 13:47:44 4 Tiny change: '$EN(u)$ = $+$$+$$cur$). In' -> '$EN(u)$ = ++$cur$). In'
en4 Английский animeshf 2016-02-20 13:46:27 4 Tiny change: 'N(u)$ = $++cur$). In ' -> 'N(u)$ = $+$$+$$cur$). In '
en3 Английский animeshf 2016-02-20 13:45:02 8
en2 Английский animeshf 2016-02-20 13:43:14 373
en1 Английский animeshf 2016-02-20 13:39:00 6803 Initial revision (saved to drafts)