| # | User | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | tourist | 3757 |
| 2 | jiangly | 3647 |
| 3 | Benq | 3581 |
| 4 | orzdevinwang | 3570 |
| 5 | Geothermal | 3569 |
| 5 | cnnfls_csy | 3569 |
| 7 | Radewoosh | 3509 |
| 8 | ecnerwala | 3486 |
| 9 | jqdai0815 | 3474 |
| 10 | gyh20 | 3447 |
| # | User | Contrib. |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | maomao90 | 171 |
| 2 | awoo | 165 |
| 3 | adamant | 164 |
| 4 | TheScrasse | 159 |
| 5 | maroonrk | 154 |
| 5 | nor | 154 |
| 7 | -is-this-fft- | 152 |
| 8 | Petr | 147 |
| 9 | orz | 146 |
| 10 | pajenegod | 145 |
Polygon API enhancement proposal
Hello, CodeForces!
Recently I was working on a Java library that implements interaction with Polygon API. It is very useful for some my tasks and it's cool that Polygon provides an API. But I discovered that is's kinda outdated. There are many new features in Polygon for which theres is no access through the API.
| Rev. | Lang. | By | When | Δ | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| en2 |
|
DishonoredRighteous | 2021-12-24 00:52:53 | 1967 | (published) | |
| en1 |
|
DishonoredRighteous | 2021-12-24 00:34:58 | 349 | Initial revision for English translation (saved to drafts) | |
| ru1 |
|
DishonoredRighteous | 2021-12-24 00:34:40 | 349 | Первая редакция (сохранено в черновиках) |
